(Trigger warning: I use the word "fuck" a lot in this essay, as I often
do when talking about my love The Tower. If this will hurt your
sensibilities, mute away please)
"No really... WTF??? I suppose he's playing with modern mythologies but... no. It really didn't work for me. " +Adrienne Kent
Adrienne is talking about the big reveal about the identities of the titular characters from Dark Tower V: Wolves of the Calla
and all the ridiculousness that they are. I am currently half-way
through my second re-read of this book as book 34 for me in the 50 book
challenge, so this may or may not sub in as my write-up for that book
when I finish it likely sometime in the next two days.
Now, I get
Adrienne's outrage here. Stephen King is pretty fucking ridiculous; at
least that's how I felt the first time through as well (though even
these pale before his blatant Mary Sue-isms in books 6 & 7,
and yet I deeply understand the analogy he's drawing with those
instances as well and will cover them when I re-read those books).
The
gist is this: I forgive Stephen King a few dumb moves in an 8 novel
saga spanning more than thirty years of writing. The end product is
still a whole that deeply moves me.
Enough of that, let's tackle
those Wolves. Lash and I were discussing the Tower recently while on a
laundry excursion, and the ridiculousness of the Wolves' identities came
up in that conversation as well. I'm going to try and cover the main
points of my discussion with him as to why I only give a slight smile
and shake of the head now as opposed to saying something like "and with
that, I'm out" (which is an understandable visceral reaction for me. I
did once write an essay called "Fuck Stephen King, Fuck Him in His
Fucking Ear" mid-way through my first read of book 7. I will share that after +Adrienne Kent finishes that book).
For
some reason, it's varying degrees of less ridiculous that King, in the
books leading to this, builds upon, changes, adapts or outright mangles
other stories from our collective body of culture in order to weave them
into the world of the Tower as some sort of Fable analogue for how our
modern mythologies are all symbols of greater things in some
psycho-babbly Jungian way, but when it comes to the Wolves we have a
convergence of three of these--and I think it's this convergence that
throws it for people.
I also think this convergence, this
absolutely ridiculous convergence, is genius. Let's look at the dark
scary figures from our popular culture over the last 20 odd years, they
have a lot of traits in common (and the same traits in common with the
dark characters of more ancient folklore): evil magic, inhumanity often
masked by robes or cloaks, and scary mystical weapons. Our black
knights, our bogeymen, are the Deatheaters. They're Darth Vader. For
some they're Dr. Doom. All of these things have inhumanity, mythical
powers & weapons, and scary cloaks. King's only done what George
Lucas, Stan Lee and JK Rowling had already done for us: taken Tolkien's
Nazgul and made them modern-scary (which he did by taking from stories
of the Black Knight, Modred, Grendel, etc.).
King already set
himself up a position where the Wolves couldn't just be mere mortals,
otherwise the challenge wouldn't be the same. But to preserve the
western aspect of this particular novel, he still needed the black
knights on horseback with weapons no mere mortal could stand up to. So
he gave us Doombots armed with lightsabers and explosive golden
snitches. And they're fucking ridiculous. And if you erase the
ridiculous and look at them objectively--they're also pretty
successfully fucking scary.
One could argue (I did) that a more
masterful ploy would have been to invent your own new archetype. But the
problem with inventing an archetype is you've no way of knowing if it's
going to work out. Darth Maul is designed to be scary, to look scary,
to inspire fear. You know what? He doesn't. Not in any way at all like
three seconds of Darth Vader breathing off-screen inspires fear.
The
Wolves are meant to be primally scary, and they're simultaneously kind
of silly, but they still pull off what they're meant to. They are
evocative of the dark and scary monsters of our culture.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment